in
Support Center

SP Server Edition vs Windows Backup (Windows 2008)

Last post 01-11-2010 9:09 PM by techexpress. 2 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 12-31-2009 12:53 PM

    SP Server Edition vs Windows Backup (Windows 2008)

    The new "Windows Backup" that built in Windows 2008 and SBS 2008 is an image based backup, same as SP.

    What are the selling points to have SP installed on Windows 2008 and SBS 2008 servers? 

     

    Happy New Year to you all!

    Jack

     

     

  • 01-11-2010 4:30 PM In reply to

    Re: SP Server Edition vs Windows Backup (Windows 2008)

    Hi Jack

    I think there are probably a range of selling points. The one thing you want more than anything else, is a reliable backup and restore. If you loose important company data, how much is that worth. Just because Windows Backup is free, does not mean that it is the most cost effective to use. If you try out both products - complete with test backups under load and restores - you'll have a better idea of what the strengths are of each.

    Here are some ideas:

    1. Company and support
      StorageCraft's focus is backup software only
      Which company is likely to provide faster support when you need it: StorageCraft or Microsoft
    2. Reliable backups and restores
      ShadowProtect tests their product backups on servers under load
      Microsoft's Windows Backup can corrupt backups (e.g. Exchange Server when under load) and get VSS into a bad state.
    3. Verifying backups over time
      ShadowProtect supports scheduled verification of backups to check against bit rot that can occur over time. 
      Microsoft's Windows Backup (I don't believe) supports this
    4. Fast, low-impact incremental backups
      ShadowProtect's fast, in-memory incremental tracking make it possible for frequent snapshots of heavily used servers.
      Windows Backup does not support this. Backups tend to be larger, slower and place more load on the server
    5. Disaster and Recovery (DR)
      • Transfer of backups offsite
        ShadowProtect's small incrementals make it possible and cost-effective to transfer them offsite as part of a comprehensive DR solution
        StorageCraft's built in MD5 support makes it possible to check for bit errors in transmitting files to remote site
        StorageCraft's ImageManager can be run at a remote site to manage, check and consolidate backups post-transfer
        Windows Backup's larger backup files make offsite transfer slower and more expensive
      • Restoring to replacement hardware
        ShadowProtect Hardware Independent Restore (HIR) supports a restore to different hardware. This is also essential for any DR solution
        Windows Backup does not (that I know of) support this. Instead, you are left with an unbootable backup.
      • Restoring to Virtual Machine
        ShadowProtect's bootable Recovery Environment CD supports a HIR. This is useful for any DR solution.
        ShadowProtect's HIR is often faster, more flexibility and provides more options compared to VM-based "import" options
        ShadowProtect's backups can, however, be imported/converted into VMware VMs using the VMware import tool.
        Windows Backup only allows "import" (convert) into Windows-based VM products
    6. Hardware upgrades/migrations
      ShadowProtect's HIR feature makes it possible to move an installed Windows OS* to new hardware (e.g. for hardware upgrade)
      Windows Backup does not support this (that I know of)
    7. Bootable recovery media
      ShadowProtect provides a pre-built, bootable recovery environment CD. This makes it possible to perform a cold backup/restore
      Windows Backup does not provide this option
    8. Boot recovery tools
      ShadowProtect's RE CD includes a range of tools (including Boot Configuration Utility and Partition Table tool) to help fix a range of boot problems
      Windows Backup does not provide this. The Windows' solution is a mix of Windows install CDs, Recovery Console, bootrec etc.
    9. Flexible backup scheduling
      ShadowProtect provides a flexible range of backup scheduling
      Windows Backup scheduling is limiting 

    * Most companies use Microsoft Windows Volume Licenses (or similar), which provide greater flexibility when moving an installation to new hardware. Often it only requires you to deactivate the original Windows install and re-active the newly restored one. However, if you purchase hardware with Windows pre-installed, the chances are it will have a more restrictive Windows OEM license - a license which is valid for that hardware only. In this case, you will need to purchase a new Windows license for use post-restore.

    Regards

    FT

  • 01-11-2010 9:09 PM In reply to

    Re: SP Server Edition vs Windows Backup (Windows 2008)

    Hi FTTester, thank you very much for the fabulous article!

    jack

     

     

     

Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
© StorageCraft Technology Corporation 2009